Legal Opinion

Lacina v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

The appellant in this case seeks to enjoin further collection of a deficiency judgment which resulted from the foreclosure of a real estate contract. The appellant argues that further collection efforts are barred by Iowa Code section 615.1 (1991), a special statute of limitations which limits actions on several types of judgments to two years. The district court ruled that section 615.1 does not bar action on a judgment of foreclosure of a real estate contract. We affirm.

I. Background facts and proceedings.

In February 1981, Jeffrey and Brenda Maxwell and appellant Lyle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. HatterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Junkin v. McClainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Sayles v. Bennett Avenue Development Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Hell v. SchultSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marcus v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. SchulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. LambSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Collins v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API