Legal Opinion

Fridman v. Rixham (In re Rixham)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 29, 2017No. Case No. 12-29426-RAG; Adv. No. 13-00079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT ORDER EXCEPTING DEBT FROM DISCHARGE

ROBERT A. GORDON, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

1. Preliminary Statement

The question presented by this Adversary Proceeding is whether the Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor, Mr. Fridman, the individual 100% owner of the corporate creditor, Golden Gate Enterprises, Inc. (Golden Gate), may personally prosecute an 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)1 exception to discharge claim that arises from debts that were instigated by the Debtor’s intentional misrepresentations but were technically extended by Golden Gate. The question is a knotty one but the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Li v. ChuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. Li v. ChuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. Onuma v. ArthurUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API