Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gahr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2004No. 03-15879; D.C. No. CV-00-01088-KJDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Petitioner Lee E. Gahr, a Canadian national, appeals from the district court’s entry of default judgment against him after he failed to file an answer to a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) complaint alleging various violations of federal securities laws in connection with Chill Tech, Inc. He argues that his failure to answer the complaint was “excusable neglect” under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), caused by his naivete and unfamiliarity with the American judicial system. We reject his argument and affirm the district court’s decision.

*891To successfully set aside a default judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. TenorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Franchise Holding Ii, Llc v. Huntington Restaurants Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gahr v. Securities and Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API