Legal Opinion

Bernell v. Betsy & Adam, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 5, 2010No. 10 Civ. 3029(JSR)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from using plaintiffs name and for a recall of defendants’ allegedly infringing garments. The parties have now, on consent, entered into a stipulated preliminary injunction, which has been docketed separately, forbidding any future use of the plaintiffs name, thus obviating the need for the Court to rule on the first request. As to the requested recall, the Court ruled at oral argument that plaintiff had not satisfied the showings required under the Lanham Act to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rompan A.S. v. Park Structures, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  2. Albert v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API