Legal Opinion
Funland Park, Inc. v. Dozier
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 2, 1963No. 62-525PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, Judge.
Helen Dozier and her husband Albert Dozier were injured when a defect de*461veloped in an amusement ride mechanism. They sued the operator charging negligent maintenance. The husband sought recovery of certain elements of damage which were derived from the wife’s injuries, and in addition sued for injuries personal to him. The case was tried before a jury on the negligence issue and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs, $25,000 for Helen Dozier and $10,000 for Albert Dozier. The defendant has appealed.
The first of a number of points raised by appellant is a contention that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Paris v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Utilities Service, Inc. v. ReplogleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fla. Rock Industries, Inc. v. United Bldg. Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Saborit v. DelifordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. WelshDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Brown v. McArthur Dairies, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Houck v. UrovDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.