Gaut v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee
At Law. Action for damages for breach of contract. On motion of defendant for direction of verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
It is the opinion of the court that the motion of the defendant to direct a verdict in its favor should be granted, and the verdict will be so entered. I might now close the case, and leave the question where the law puts it; but it would be intolerable to counsel on either side, and to you, that I should make no explanation for taking that course. But what I am saying is not a charge upon which any exceptions can be taken, or of which any error can be predicated, as I am simply explaining to you the reasons why I direct your verdict in favor of the defendant, for your own information, and as…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Benjamin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Thomas v. Knights of Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Newman v. Supreme LodgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Trisler v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Schmierer v. Mut. Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.