Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Price

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1908No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 63, March T., 1908, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1907, No. 351, for defendant on case stated in suit of Patrick Higgins, collector of school taxes for the School District of Lackawanna Township, v. Luther Price. Case stated to determine liability of real estate for a school tax'. Before Edwards, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 63, March T., 1908, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1907, No. 351, for defendant on case stated in suit of Patrick Higgins, collector of school taxes for the School District of Lackawanna Township, v. Luther Price. Case stated to determine liability of real estate for a school tax'. Before Edwards, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was' in .entering judgment for defendant on the case stated.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

- It appears by the case stated that the territory in which the defendant’s house and lot are located, being then a part of the township of Lackawanna, “ was annexed to the city of Scranton by- decree of the court of quarter sessions, made and entered August 8, 1904,” and “became a part of said city of Scranton on the first Monday of January, 1905.” It appears further that in the same year the school.district of the city of Scranton, which comprehends the whole city, levied a tax for school purposes on the defendant’s real estate and that he duly paid the tax to the city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheraden BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Powell v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API