Legal Opinion

United States v. Daryl Riewe

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1982No. 80-1611PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Daryl Riewe seeks review of a district court order finding him in contempt of court for failing to appear at a hearing where he was to show cause why a summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should not be enforced. The district court ordered Riewe confined in the county jail…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Consumers Gas & Oil, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. United States v. Robert C. Jones and Dona JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. O'Connor v. Midwest Pipe Fabrications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API