Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Village of Shorewood

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The plaintiff urges, first, that sec. 905 of the Statutes of 1915, being the same as in the Statutes of 1917, is unconstitutional for the reason that it does not limit the special assessment to the actual benefits received by the property owner, and that the statute and the proceedings thereunder, therefore, are in violation of the Fourteenth amendment of the federal constitution and of sec. 13, art. I, of the state constitution, which section provides: “The property of no person shall be taken for public use without just compensation.”

*315That portion of said sec. 905 applicable herein reads as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Knox v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Oconto Co. v. JerrardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hayes v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. People Ex Rel. Howlett v. Mayor & Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. George Williams College v. Village of Williams BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lamasco Realty Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Perkins v. PeacockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Armory Realty Co. v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API