Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lovell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 1975No. 49963Published

1ConcurrenceRoberts, Judge

I concur in the opinion of the Court which I reluctantly agree correctly states the law applicable to this case. I only wish to add a few comments on the status of married juveniles in Texas.

In the case at bar, appellant was protected as a “child” under V.T.C.A., Family Code, Sec. 51.09(1). Yet it was also shown that he was married at the time of the offense. V.T.C.A., Family Code, Sec. 4.03 provides:

“Except as expressly provided by statute or by the constitution, every person who has been married in accordance with the law of this state, regardless of age, has the power and capacity of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Pittman Ex Rel. Pittman v. Time SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Ward v. LavyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API