Legal Opinion

Hochstein v. . Schlanger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 4, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 4, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. The following questions were certified: “ 1. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? 2. Are two causes of action improperly united ? ”

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, first question certified answered in the affirmative, second question in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Stehl v. UrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Tousey v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Kramer v. Relgov Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934