Legal Opinion

Central R. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 4, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff may have judgment, without costs, ordering the Trustee to release to the plaintiff the properties mentioned in the complaint.

I. My subject matter jurisdiction in this cause is based on diversity of citizenship.

The plaintiff is a New Jersey corporation, and all the defendants against whom service of process has been made herein are corporations of other States than New Jersey; and although some of the intervenors are citizens of New Jersey, their intervention does not unsettle the jurisdiction vested in this Court by reason of the original diversity of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Baker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. Wabash Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  5. Baker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chase National Bank v. Manila Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Rievman v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Penna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API