Wallace Ads. Dowling
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DrVorE, J., Charleston, February term, 1909. Action by W. P. Dowling against J. V. Wallace. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: Contract must be in writing: Code, 1902, 2653; 1 Green. Ev., 108; 29 S. C., 533; 12 Ency., 22, 16; 22 Ohio St., 62; 72 Neb., 887; 101 N. W., 1001; 60 S'. C., 373; 9 Rich., 105; Smith on Frauds, 533, 539.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an action on contract for the sale of a cameragraph.
The complaint contains the following allegations:
First. “That heretofore, to wit: on the 28th day of May, 1907, the plaintiff herein, made with the defendant herein, a contract whereby the plaintiff was to deliver to the defendant, one power cameragraph No. 5, with a 240-volt circular rheostat, and one shutter, for which defendant was to pay this plaintiff the sum of two hundred and thirteen dollars.
Second. “That in due course and according to said agreement, this plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Noland Company, Incorporated, and Third-Party and Cross-Appellant v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Company, Third-Party and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Gray Communications Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
- Robert Harmon and Bore, Inc. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Fanning v. BogackiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
- Cape County Milling Co. v. Morris & HighSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.