Legal Opinion

People v. Hanson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2000No. S078689PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

—When a defendant successfully appeals a criminal conviction, California’s constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy precludes the imposition of more severe punishment on resentencing. (People v. Henderson (1963) 60 Cal.2d 482, 495-497 [35 Cal.Rptr. 77, 386 P.2d 677] (Henderson).) The question here is whether a statutorily mandated restitution fine comes within this rule. We conclude such fines constitute punishment and find no principled basis for excluding them from the rationale of Henderson. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which upheld…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API