Waldman v. Crommelin's Adm'r

The appellant objects to the exclusion of certain testimony in his behalf, given by his partner as to transactions with, and statements by, Thomas *581Crommelin, the predecessor of the plaintiffs in the administration of the' estate of Charles Crommelin. The note sued on was made by the appellant and his witness as partners, and was payable to Thomas Crommelin, adm’r. The evidence excluded tended to show that the defendant had paid a portion of the money to Thomas Crommelin himself, and the remainder to Robinson, at the request of the said Thomas Crommelin.

The spirit of section 2704 of the…