Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Heinkel Filtering Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2014No. 13-3512, 13-3513PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Heinkel Filtering Systems, Inc. (Heinkel), and Pepperl & Fuchs, Inc. (Pepperl), appeal from an order of the district court 1 granting Bill and Michelle Mullen’s motion to dismiss without prejudice. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
I
In December 2011, Bill Mullen sustained injuries on the job from a centrifuge manufactured by Heinkel and containing a component part sold and distributed by Pepperl. Mullen and his wife, Michelle, brought suit against Heinkel and Pepperl in Iowa state court, seeking damages based on a products-liability…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frances Kern v. Txo Production CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Thatcher v. Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- George Donner v. Alcoa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Glen HOFFMANN, Appellee, v. ALSIDE, INC., and United States Steel Corporation, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by38 opinions
- Michael Blaes v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Thirty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars & Fifty-Six Cents ($32,820.56) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Ricky Tillman, Jr. v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- SnugglyCat, Inc. v. Opfer Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Thirty-two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars & Fifty-Six CentsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.