Legal Opinion

Strnad v. Strnad

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Williamson. Tried below before Hon. R. L. Penn.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

Joseph Strnad, appellant, sued John H. Strnad and Anton G-. Strnad in District Court, on promissory note, and for foreclosure of deed of trust executed by them on the south half of lot 4 in block 9, in Dickson’s first addition, in town of Taylor, Texas, the note dated September 15, 1894, due October 1, 1895, bearing 10 per cent interest per annum from date, providing for payment of 10 per cent attorneys fees, if placed in the hands of an attorney for collection.

Mary Strnad (joined by her husband John H. Strnad) intervened, and set up that subsequent to the date of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schuster v. L. Bauman Jewelry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ullmann, Lewis & Co. v. JasperTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Baldridge v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Highsaw v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Newton v. Houston Hot Well Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Bassham v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909
  5. Second Nat. Bank of Houston v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API