Legal Opinion

In re Zuky

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 21, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The creditors whose claims were in the majority in number and amount had the right to elect the trustee. Section 44, Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9628).

So far as I can determine, they nominated two gentlemen in succession, Mr. Taylor and Mr. O’Connor, to both of whom objections were urged, and the referee indicated’ that he would not approve them, and without intending any reflection on the gentlemen personally, both of whom appear to be men of high character, I agree with the ref.eree that no assignee or person closely associated in business with an assignee should be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re LewensohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. In re Van De MarkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1910
  3. In re MackellarDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. In re HareDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1902
  5. In re JacobsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Eloise Curtis, Inc., Bankrupt, James Talcott, Inc., a Creditor, James G. Foley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Peerless Manufacturing Company v. LimperisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. LimperisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Taylor v. PriceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API