Carter v. Carolina Tobacco Co., Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Today we are asked to determine what it means to manufacture cigarettes under Indiana law. The trial court determined that the Indiana Office of Attorney General (OAG), the appellant-defendant in this case, erroneously refused to list the “Roger” brand of cigarettes in its Directory of Cigarettes Approved for Stamping and Sale (the Directory) because appellee-plaintiff Carolina Tobacco Company, Inc. (CTC) allegedly was not a tobacco product manufacturer (TPM). In essence, if CTC is not the manufacturer of “Roger” cigarettes, CTC may not sell that product in Indiana.
St…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bushong v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- LTV Steel Co. v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carolina Tobacco Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- County Council of Porter County v. Northwest Indiana Regional Development AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kohlmeyer v. Second Injury FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sanitary District of the City of Hammond, Indiana and the City of Hammond, Indiana v. Town of Griggith, Indiana Town of Highland, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Sanitary District of the City of Hammond, Indiana and the City of Hammond, Indiana v. Town of Griggith, Indiana Town of Highland, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.