Legal Opinion

Cekalovich v. Ruljanovich

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1944No. 10705Published

1Per curiam

Appellee and cross-appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 837, infra, to prosecute his cross-appeal in his suit to recover wages, maintenance and cure under a law for his health and safety without bond or prepayment of costs is granted. Grant v. United States S. Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 2 Cir., 24 F.2d 812.

To the suggestion that appellants and cross-appellees, appealing from a decree holding them liable as shipowners for wages, maintenance and cure to appellee, a seaman on their ship, have the right to prosecute their appeal on the question of their liability as shipowners without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grant v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API