Corwin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murdering more than one person pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct, a capital offense under V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.03(a)(6)(B).1 The jury returned “yes” answers to the special issues under former Article 37.071, § (b), V.A.C.C.P., and punishment was assessed accordingly at death. Id., § (e). The appeal is automatic to this Court. Id., § (h). Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence either to support appellant’s guilt or the jury’s affirmative answers to the special issues.
7. CRIME
In his fourteenth point of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Escamilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.