Legal Opinion

Gillette v. North Dakota Disciplinary Board Counsel, Edison

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 14, 2009No. 3:08-cr-00102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

This is an action filed against the Assistant Disciplinary Counsel for the Disciplinary Board of the North Dakota Supreme Court, Brent Edison, in his official capacity. See Docket No. 1. On December 12, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.” See Docket No. 3. On December 22, 2008, the Defendant filed a brief in opposition to the motion. See Docket No. 7. On January 2, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a reply…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haagensen v. Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API