Legal Opinion

Blayney v. Donegal Township

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided May 5, 1928No. 209Published

1Opinion of the CourtCummins, J.

Plaintiff's action is in assumpsit to recover for an alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff in his statement of claim alleges that a written contract was entered into between himself and defendant township, whereby he agreed “to unload, haul and distribute sufficient slag from cars at the B. & 0. station at Vienna ... to properly complete the construction of three miles of road, known as the Haneytown Road;” in consideration whereof defendant agreed to pay him 70 cents per ton for all slag so hauled, to be paid bi-monthly; that when one-half of said three-mile section of road had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Philadelphia Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Hontz v. Hollenback TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API