Legal Opinion

MATTER OF JONES v. McCoy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Before an employee of the unified court system may seek judicial relief, he must exhaust whatever administrative remedies have been made available to him (Matter of Kalichstein v McCoy, 23 NY2d 978, 980). Since petitioner had not exhausted his available remedy under 22 NYCRR 25.5, the court below properly dismissed this article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus. Moreover, the extraordinary remedy is available only when there is a clear legal right and is still subject to the exercise of discretion by the courts below, which this court might or might not have the power to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MATTER OF KALICHSTEIN v. McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pavone v. BarclayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Abreu v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Turner v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. New York Life Insurance v. AgeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API