Legal Opinion

Daimwood v. Driscoll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Nueces County; W. B. Hopkins, Judge. Action! by W. H. Daimwood against R. Driscoll and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action of trespass to try title to three-fifths of 1,328.89 acres of land in Nueces county out of the Puenticitas grant, instituted by appellant against R. Driscoll, Samuel Althaus, and Jim Jacobson. Appellee Driscoll pleaded not guilty, and three, five, and ten years' limitation, and further pleaded his title to the land through a sale made by the executor of the estate of Mrs. Ursula Daimwood under authority of an order of the probate court of Nueces county, and that each of the heirs of Mrs. Ursula Daimwood, among the number appellant and Ida Magnenat and Amelia Augusta…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Harris County v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Goodman v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bearden v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Gillette's Estate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Heavey v. CastlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Wilkinson v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Farley v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API