State Nat. Bank of Denison v. Eureka Springs Water Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas
In Equity- Action by the State National Bank of Denison against the -Eureka Springs Water Company and others. On demurrer for want of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS. District Judge.
The State National Bank of Denison, Tex., a corporation organized under the banking laws of the United States, and a citizen of Texas, as complainant brought this suit against the Eureka Springs Water Company, a corporation organized under *828the laws of Arkansas, W. M. Duncan, and C. C. McCarty, citizens of Arkansas, residing in the Harrison Division of the Western Judicial District. The .material facts are these: The Eureka Springs Water Company executed its two several promissory notes, made payable to the order of W. M. Duncan, each for the sum of $5,000. Duncan, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mexican National Railroad v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wichita Nat. Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Wilson v. Knox CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890
- New Orleans v. QuinlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Newgass v. City of New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tillman v. Russo Asiatic BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- City of Stuart v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Baltimore Trust Co. v. Screven CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
- Hollingsworth v. Multa Trina Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- New Orleans Commercial Corp. v. City of AlbertvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1940