Legal Opinion

Huddle House v. Peralta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2000No. 1D99-1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Huddle House and Crawford & Company (respectively employer and carrier, hereinafter “e/c”) appeal an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (hereinafter “JCC”) approving claimant’s motion for sanctions and protective order, and ordering the e/c’s rehabilitation providers not to communicate directly and/or ex parte with any of claimant’s health care providers. The JCC further ordered that the e/c’s rehabilitation providers may, after reasonable notice and coordination with claimant’s attorney to allow claimant’s attorney to be present, communicate or meet with claimant’s health…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Farhangi v. Dunkin DonutsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benton v. U.S. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API