Shaul v. Duprey
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Lee Circuit Court. Hon. M. T. Sanders, Judge. The judgment rendered at the spring term, 1884, was full and complete, and under it a partial satisfaction has been made. The judgment at the October term was likewise a full and complete judgment, and not within the scope or authority of the circuit court to render same as a nunc fro tunc order.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Lee Circuit Court. Hon. M. T. Sanders, Judge. The judgment rendered at the spring term, 1884, was full and complete, and under it a partial satisfaction has been made. The judgment at the October term was likewise a full and complete judgment, and not within the scope or authority of the circuit court to render same as a nunc fro tunc order. The second judgment is void, no notice having ben given to appellants, nor opportunity given them to show what satisfaction had been made upon the original judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The object of this bill was to enjoin the execution of a judgment which was alleged to be void for want of notice.
Erom the bill, answer and exhibits, it appeared that one Richardson, having been found guilty of a criminal offense by a justice of the peace, had taken an appeal, giving a supersedeas bond with plaintiffs as his sureties; that he was again convicted in the circuit court and judgment rendered against him and his sureties for a fine of $200 and costs, but by some clerical misprision, the judgment was in fact entered against Richardson alone; that at the next term the court, without…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wood v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Sledge-Norfleet Co. v. MatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Knight v. CreswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Dale v. BlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Sibeck v. McTiernanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.