Legal Opinion
Rotter v. Coconino County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 29, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 88-146PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*211OPINION
GRANT, Chief Judge.
In granting declaratory relief against Franz Rotter and in favor of certain neighboring property owners and Coconino County, the trial court held that due to protests filed by several neighboring owners, A.R.S. § 11-829(C) required a unanimous favorable vote of the members of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors (the board) for approval of Rotter’s request to rezone portions of two parcels he owned. On Rotter’s appeal, we must determine whether the trial court correctly interpreted A.R.S. § 11-829(0).1
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts material to this appeal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Levin v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rotter v. Coconino CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990