Legal Opinion

Mathews, Admx. v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1936No. 5189Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HAMILTON, J.

This case is here on two questions of law. The first question presented is on a motion of the defendant to dismiss the appeal, for claimed defects in the perfecting of the same. We have examined the record on this point and find no jurisdictional bar to the consideration of the appeal. The motion is therefore overruled.

The next question of law is as to the correctness of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition.

The amended petition in substance alleges that the plaintiff is the widow of James E. Mathews, deceased; that she is the duly appointed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. BehrOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API