City of Sault Ste Marie v. Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Petitioner city appeals as of right from a decision and order of the Michigan Employment Relations Commission dismissing an unfair *352labor practice charge filed by the city against respondent union. We reverse.
The union is the exclusive bargaining representative for the city’s law enforcement employees, including its sergeants and patrol officers. The collective bargaining agreement effective from July Í, 1980, through June 30, 1983, between the city and the patrol unit contained in § 9.4(6) the following minimum manning clause:
Minimum Manning: The employer agrees to maintain the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Town of Narragansett v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Local 1277, Metropolitan Council No. 23, American Federation of State Employees v. City of Center LineMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Mid-Michigan Education Ass'n v. St. Charles Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Toledo Police Patrolman's Ass'n, Local 10 v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Trenton v. Trenton Fire Fighters Union, Local 2701Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Oak Park Public Safety Officers Ass'n v. City of Oak ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.