Legal Opinion

Hazera v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1994No. 93-2757Published

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company. We affirm.

Edna Hazera (Hazera) was a pedestrian injured when she was struck by a driver whose car was insured by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). The car insurance included Personal Injury Protection, (PIP), with a $10,000 policy limit. Hazera had no other medical insurance coverage, but was a Medicare recipient. As a result of the accident, Hazera incurred hospital and medical expenses from various providers totalling approximately $27,000. Palmetto General Hospital (Palmetto)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. AMERICAN RISK ASSUR. CO. v. BenrubeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API