Legal Opinion

Kaczynski v. Anderson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2007No. Docket No. 268529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Apsey v Mem Hosp (On Reconsideration), 266 Mich App 666; 702 NW2d 870 (2005).

The Court further orders that parts C and D of the opinion in this case, which address the out-of-state notary requirements for an affidavit of merit in a medical malpractice claim, are vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Kaczynski v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. White v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API