Legal Opinion

United States v. Nash

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 25, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This is one of those comparatively rare eases in which cumulative sentences are indicated as appropriate.

I shall impose sueh sentences.

I. The defendants now to be sentenced have been convicted on two counts.

On the first count they have been found guilty under title 18, U. S. C., § 91 (18 USCA § 91), of bribery of an officer of the United States, for which the penalty is not more than three times the amount of the bribe, in this case $1,000, and imprisonment for not more than three years.

They have also been found guilty under the second count, under the Conspiracy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Hostetter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Humphries v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SavarinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  2. People v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API