Legal Opinion

Model Land & Irrigation Co. v. Baca Irrigating Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1927No. 11,368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

For convenience we hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff and defendants in error as defendants. Iii a general statutory proceeding for the adjudication of priorities of right to the use of water for irrigation, defendants were decreed certain priorities “for stock and household purposes.” Plaintiff, claiming this water under its storage appropriation, brings error to review that judgment.

This action was begun under the statutes of 1879 and 1881 (Laws 1879, p. 94 and Laws 1881, p. 142) and first terminated in a decree entered August 10,1903. Defendants were parties- thereto and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Bromwell v. Estate of BromwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Beal v. United Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. People ex rel. Dolan v. HerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Hardesty Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Great Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Farmer Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. Brimble v. SicklerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API