Legal Opinion

United States v. Pauling

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 12, 2017No. 16-CR-563 (JPO)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:

On February 16, 2017, following a jury trial, John Pauling was convicted of conspiring to traffic in heroin, as well as several other narcotics and firearms crimes. (Dkt. No. 37.) Pauling moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 to vacate the portion of the jury’s verdict which found that the charged conspiracy involved a least 100 grams of heroin. In the alternative, Pauling moves for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. For the reasons that follow, Pauling’s motion to vacate is granted, and his motion…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API