Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ship Canal Authority v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 16, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

— Relator, a public agency created by Chapter 16176, Acts 1933, has instituted this proceeding to compel obedience on the part of respondent Clerk of the Circuit Court to the terms and requirements of Chapter 17022, Acts 1935, which Act respondent has set up in his reply to the proceeding, is unconstitutional and should not he complied with.

In this case a peremptory writ of mandamus should be awarded, however, on the authority of Curtiss Properties, Inc., v. Leatherman, Clerk Circuit Court, 125 Fla. 72, 169 Sou. Rep. 612, it appearing that the effect of Chapter 17022, Acts of 1935, is to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of EqualizersSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Crim v. JuvenalSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Howarth v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenal v. NevilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Grim v. JuvenalSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Steele v. FreelSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. United States ex rel. Horigan v. HeywardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephens Timber Co. v. LangSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephens Timber Co. v. LangSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API