Legal Opinion

Doonan v. Killilea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1915Published

Action by Daniel Doonan and another against Thomas Kfflulea and others.

1Per curiam

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment (87 Misc. Rep. 427, 149 N. Y. Supp. 832) affirmed, with costs, on authority of De Peyster v. Murphy, 66 N. Y. 622. We do not understand that tins case has been expressly overruled or limited by Real Estate Corporation v. Harper, 174 N. Y. 123, 66 N. E. 660. See, also, 166 App. Div. 937, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1113.

THOMAS, J., not voting.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Peyster v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Real Estate Corporation v. . HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Doonan v. KillileaNew York Supreme Court · 1914