Coppenolle v. Falcone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We deny the petition seeking cer-tiorari review of orders relating to the petitioner’s notice of lis pendens. We write to address only the petitioner’s argument that she should not have been required to post a bond because her complaint was founded on a “duly recorded document” within the meaning of section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2001). Bond is not required in that situation because the *463recorded document itself puts third parties on notice and clouds the title to the property. Avalon Assocs. of Delaware Ltd. v. Avalon Park Assocs., Inc., 760 So.2d 1132, 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Sailfish…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Med. Facilities Dev. v. Little Arch CreekSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Avalon Associates of Delaware Ltd. v. Avalon Park Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Sailfish Point, Inc. v. Sailfish Point Owners Representatives ex rel. JaffeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Panamericano of SD, Inc. v. SUNCOAST BAY DEVEL., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002