Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1908PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. J. W. Reed was indicted, tried and convicted of violation of the election laws. From the judgment and sentence following such conviction defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner King.

J. W. Reed was indicted on a charge of having persuaded Harry Young, June 8, 1906, to remove to precinct No. 37, of Multnomah County, in which precinct he was not then an inhabitant, for the purpose of his voting therein at a general election, to be held throughout the State of Oregon on the following day. A trial was had in December of the same year, resulting in defendant’s conviction and sentence; hence this appeal.

*3801. The section of the Code under which Reed was indicted became a law in 1870 (Laws 1870, p. 22, §1), and is as follows:

“Any person who shall by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Marsden v. HarlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. ClementsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Matasce v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. DaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sedillo v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API