People v. Saunders
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Dominic R Massaro, J.
The principal issue to be resolved on this reconsideration is whether use of a toilet stall in a public restroom at a prison facility gives rise to a subjective expectation of privacy that society accepts as objectively reasonable. The court holds that it does not, and that governmental intrusion in this limited context is not constitutionally prohibited by the Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure Clause. The reported cases provide no guidance with respect to the unique fact pattern presented here.
*545An indictment has been filed against the defendant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. HemmingsNew York Supreme Court · 2012