Legal Opinion

Wyman v. Danais

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1958No. 4699PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The narrow issue in this case is whether the Attorney General may compel the county attorney by writ of mandamus to turn over papers and files relating to a criminal prosecution. However, the broader issue, which the Court and both counsel seek to have determined, is the clarification of the duties of the Attorney General and the county attorney in criminal prosecutions. This is made clear in the conclusion of the county attorney’s brief which reads as follows: “That in disposing of Petitioner’s Writ of Mandamus, that the Honorable Court go further and set forth the duties of the Petitionee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas Reid v. New Hampshire Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  2. Bussiere v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Bokowsky v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. In Re AshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Eames v. RudmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API