Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Darla Environmental Specialists, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
The Darla defendants completed some work for the government and GSA has paid them about six and a half million dollars for it and owes another half million ($449,814.88 to be exact). GSA has not paid Darla because it appears to exist no longer, dissolved by the Illinois Secretary of State, and, consequently, has not requested payment. This court enjoined payment of the remainder because Automatic Sprinkler has a claim to the money; a good claim, in fact, to enforce an Ohio state court judgment for half a million dollars ($449,044 and costs, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Buchanan v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- In re Joliet-Will County Community Action AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Bank of Aspen v. Fox Cartage, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Darla Environmental Specialists Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Automatic Sprinkler Corporation Of America v. Darla Environmental Specialists Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Park Miller, LLC v. Durham Group, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2020