United States v. Garcia
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
Robert Garcia contends the district court should have suppressed evidence obtained from a search of his residence. He argues the authorizing warrant was invalid because (1) it was stale and (2) the address on the warrant did not match his residence. The warrant was executed before it became stale and within the time constraints of the federal rules. And, because the warrant adopted the supporting affidavit’s unambiguous description of the residence, the address mismatch is of no consequence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A reliable confidential informant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Voss v. BergsgaardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edward DunningsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. PulliamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- State v. AlthausCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- Justin Armando Marquez v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- Michael Joseph Herdt v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.