Ex Parte Patterson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentWindom, Judge
I respectfully disagree with the majority’s determination that Rodney Wayne Patterson is entitled to the reinstatement of his original bail. As discussed in detail below, I do not believe that Patterson’s acquittal of the charge that formed the basis of his bail revocation establishes a lack of probable cause that he committed the new offense and, thus, forfeited his right to bail. See Rule 7.5(b), Ala. R.Crim. P. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
“The Constitution of the State of Alabama provides ‘[t]hat all persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, except…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Loper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.