Legal Opinion
Antoine Hubert Provancial v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1972No. 71-1207PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
Appellant, Antoine Hubert Provancial, is a twenty-seven year old male Indian who is an enrolled member of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe in South Dakota. Under date of November 13, 1969, he filed a claim against the United States in the sum of $250,000 for loss of sight of his right eye. The loss allegedly was the result of an arrest and detention incident involving two employees of the Police Department of Mission, South Dakota. On May 20, 1970, the Department of the Interior administratively denied the claim. Appellant then brought his action on the claim in the…
2Cited by28 opinions
- Gregory v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Lizzie Ethel Kielwien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Gregory v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Richard Rise, Ind., Etc. v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. Floyd R. Cooper and South Fulton Hospital, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.