Bessent v. Bessent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A family offense must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Pearlman v Pearlman, 78 AD3d 711, 712 [2010]). “The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the [trial] [c]ourt, and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if supported by the record” (Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32, 43-44 [2010]; see Matter of King v Edwards, 92 AD3d 783 [2012]).
Here, a fair preponderance of the credible…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Pearlman v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Salazar v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cavanaugh v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Czop v. CzopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.