Legal Opinion

State v. Gach

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 6, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Gary Gach appeals from a judgment of conviction for assault (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 207(1)(A) (2005), entered in the District Court (Waterville, Anderson, J.) following his plea of no contest. Gach asserts that he did not voluntarily waive his right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 6 of the Maine Constitution because he was not individually advised of his right to counsel and his right to apply for court-appointed counsel prior to the court’s acceptance of his no contest plea. We dismiss Gach’s appeal and do not reach…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. State v. PfeilSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. State v. PlummerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. State of Maine v. Danny L. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Price v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API