Legal Opinion

Suriel v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered on or about April 13, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate an underlying default pursuant to CPLR 5015 and to restore the matter to active status, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action in which plaintiff allegedly was bitten by a dog owned by a tenant, we agree with the motion court that the complaint, as pleaded, evinces no meritorious cause of action against the landlord, specifically as to whether the landlord knew of the dog’s presence and had notice of its vicious *102propensities (Carter v Metro N.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Metro North AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. LePore v. DiCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Craft v. Clark Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Rivers v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Almodovar v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API