Legal Opinion

Mateo v. Abad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages resulting from the conversion of his property, consisting of a grocery store and butcher shop. The conversion arose from the fraudulent taking of part of plaintiff’s property by the defendant Abad and from the illegal sale by a marshal of the remaining property upon a judgment obtained by the defendant corporation.

The complaint sets forth five causes of action. The first is against Louis Abad for conversion; the second is against that defendant for fraud and conversion; the third is against the defendant corporation for conversion.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brush v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Grein v. YohonNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Spirou v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKenna v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API